Related Party Transactions


I had a meeting with a client last week that highlighted to me the importance of understanding your obligations when dealing with related parties of your company. This client was experiencing some significant financial difficulty and thought that the assets the client wished to protect from the company at risk of going into liquidation, were in fact protected.

We discovered a number of related party transactions that were never properly recorded, legally or from an accounting perspective, which could have jeopardised millions of dollars in assets.

ASIC have recently issued a regulation providing guidance for entities on ASIC’s expectations and requirements in relation to various aspects of “related-party transactions” under the Corporations Act.

The revised guide increases the standard of disclosure for related-party transactions and general disclosure documents.

Under the Corporations Act, a company must obtain shareholder approval to give a financial benefit to a related party. An exception to this is when the transaction is on terms that would be reasonable in the circumstances, if the company and related party were dealing at arm’s length, or on terms that were less favourable to the related party.

ASIC has included a checklist of factors that companies need to consider when determining whether the “arms length” exception applies. At a minimum, these are:

  1. how the terms of the overall transaction compare with those of any comparable transactions between parties dealing on an arm’s length basis in similar circumstances;
  2. the nature and content of the bargaining process, including whether the entity followed robust protocols to ensure that conflicts of interest were appropriately managed in negotiating and structuring the transaction;
  3. the impact of the transaction on the entity (e.g. the impact of dealing on those terms on the financial position and performance of the company) and non-associated members;
  4. any other options available to the entity and why they did not or could not proceed; and
  5. any expert advice received by the entity on the transaction.

It is very important to get experienced legal and accounting advice to ensure these transactions are not at risk of being clawed back, at some point in the future, or realising unexpected tax consequences.

Please contact me to discuss any questions you may have for related party transactions in your business.

Tagged in: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You may also be interested in:

6 Things You Can Expect When Declaring Bankruptcy

Declaring bankruptcy should be your last resort when you are faced with financial difficulties, whether as an individual or as a business owner. It is not exactly a “Get Out of Jail Free” card, as it comes with many adverse consequences, which may significantly impact your financial standing over a considerable period. So what consequences continue reading

How do you determine if a company is insolvent?

The answer to the question “How do you determine if a company is insolvent?” is important because there are serious consequences for a director if debts are incurred after the company has become insolvent, including civil penalties, compensation proceedings and criminal charges. However, it is often difficult to know when a company has crossed the continue reading

What to do if you receive an ATO Director Penalty Notice

Did you know that company directors may potentially become personally liable for unremitted Pay As You Go (PAYG) deductions and Superannuation Guarantee Charges (SGCs)? The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has significant powers to recover a company’s unpaid liabilities personally through its directors and may issue a Director Penalty Notice (DPN). This article focuses on the continue reading

Liability Limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation | Website by VA